Hank,
Thanks. I've seen that article, but it did not furnish me with any
"experiences" with these technologies. I appreciate the reference.
Anybody have hands-on with these approaches and the relative strengths
or weaknesses?
Thanks,
Marc
From hank@max.ibm.net.il Wed Nov 12 23:13:40 1997
Received: from max.ibm.net.il (root@max.ibm.net.il [192.115.72.170]) by
biff.ibm.net.il (8.8.7/8.8.2) with ESMTP id JAA20008; Thu, 13 Nov 1997
09:13:20 +0200
Received: from max.ibm.net.il (hank@max.ibm.net.il [192.115.72.170]) by
max.ibm.net.il (8.8.7/8.8.2) with SMTP id JAA92056; Thu, 13 Nov 1997
09:13:18 +0200
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 09:13:18 +0200 (IST)
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
To: Marcel Schoenbeck <pbalum@hotmail.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: your mail
In-Reply-To: <19971112205706.6946.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID:
<Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.971113091145.76182A-100000@max.ibm.net.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCIIPretty comprehensive comparison done on 10/97 by Data Communications on
these and other companies. See:
http://www.data.com/roundups/class_system.html-Hank
hello Nanog,
A While back there was a thread on QoS, CoS...
I'm interested what people think about this category of products.
There