Correct me if I'm wrong, Leo, but your assertion turns on the fact that
the server will accept an overwriting cache entry for something it
already has cacheed, does it not?
Do djb and Power in fact do that?
If they don't, the window of opportunity to poison something like .com
is limited to the period between when that entry expires from the local
server's cache and the next time it hears a reply -- which will be the
time after that expiry when someone next requests a .com name; IE
almost immediately, no?
Everyone seems to continue asking "why can poisoning overwrite already
cached answer" and no one seems to be answering, and, unless I'm a
moron (which is not impossible), that's the crux of this issue.
Cheers,
-- jra