UUNET service

I tried to notify UUNET at their 800-900-0241 number that there was a
loop in their network. They told me that if I didn’t have an account
with them they were not interested in any information that I may have
had for them. I stated that I was just calling so that they could pass
the information onto an engineer. He repeated himself saying if you do
not have an account with us I will not do anything with the information.
I guess they think they run the internet and us small ISPs couldn’t
possibly know anything...

In case someone at UUNET reads this here is the traceroute.

To me, that looks more like an outage (now fixed) on a customer network.
The 'loop' between 500.Serial2-11.GW4.BWI1.ALTER.NET and
core62007-gw.customer.alter.net, could likely be caused by UU's customer
advertising an aggregate route to UU, but not actually having a route to
the IP...so they default back to UU, and UU sends it back to the customer.

This was likely a problem on the customer's network, so why should UUNet
take a trouble report from you? Not only are you not _the_ customer,
you're not even a customer, and it's likely not a problem they can do
anything about. If it really were a UUNet problem, they probably assume
their customer will report it.

Also sprach jlewis@lewis.org

To me, that looks more like an outage (now fixed) on a customer
network. The 'loop' between 500.Serial2-11.GW4.BWI1.ALTER.NET and
core62007-gw.customer.alter.net, could likely be caused by UU's
customer advertising an aggregate route to UU, but not actually having
a route to the IP...so they default back to UU, and UU sends it back to
the customer.

That was my thought when I saw the (mangled) traceroute.

This was likely a problem on the customer's network, so why should
UUNet take a trouble report from you?

This is a really crappy attitude...but its one I hear from a lot of
Internet providers, and that I frequently hear from telco's too. I make
the argument that its *not* in the provider's best interest to take this
attitude.

Basically, what you are saying is that you really don't care of your
network actually *works* or not.

I'll take a credible trouble report about my network from anyone. (Note
the use of the term "credible" there) If my network is operating in
some sub-standard way, I want to know about it, and I don't care of I
find out about it from a customer or from some random person halfway
around the globe.

To be quite honest, the mindset of "You're not our customer, I won't
take your report about our network being screwed up," boggles my mind.

Like I said...I get the same attitude from telco's (particularly
BellSouth that I deal with a lot), and it blows my mind. BellSouth has
*NO* way for me, as someone that deals with the PSTN a *LOT*, and has
the ability to correlate reports of problems and determine where there
are likely significant problems, to report problems to them because "I'm
not the customer." They would rather calls not be completely than to be
pointed to where their network is broken by a non-customer. Where is
the logic in that? The most recent example of this was that we were
having customer from 2 CO's (actually, one CO and one remote node off
that CO) that were unable to complete ISDN data calls to us. It took
BellSouth over 3 days to fix this when they could've had it fixed in
less than 2 hours if they had just taken my trouble report.

I can even extend this to equipment vendors. I've had more than one
equipment vendor that refused to take a bug report from me (even a
blatent security vulnerability in one case!) because I didn't have a
support contract.

*blink*

I'm doing your work for you, and you refuse to accept my gift of my
troubleshooting time and effort.

So...in this case with uu.net. Take the report, it takes about 2
seconds to come to the conclusion that we have here. That being, this
is likely a customer with a default pointed back...nothing we can do
about. Then you dump the report in the circular file and go about your
merry way.

I tried to notify UUNET at their 800-900-0241 number that there was a
loop in their network. They told me that if I didn�t have an account
with them they were not interested in any information that I may have
had for them. I stated that I was just calling so that they could pass
the information onto an engineer. He repeated himself saying if you do
not have an account with us I will not do anything with the information.
I guess they think they run the internet and us small ISPs couldn�t
possibly know anything...

  I don't think this is a UUnet problem.

-snip-

12 | 65.195.230.218 | core62007-gw.customer.alter.net
13 | 162.33.130.4 | i97.toad.net
14 | 162.33.128.249 | tiara-2-balto.ds1.toad.net
15 | 205.197.182.201 | max2.toad.net
16 | 162.33.138.129 | mmsi-cpe.dsllan.toad.net
17 | 65.195.230.217 | 500.Serial2-11.GW4.BWI1.ALTER.NET
18 | 65.195.230.218 | core62007-gw.customer.alter.net
19 | 65.195.230.217 | 500.Serial2-11.GW4.BWI1.ALTER.NET
20 | 65.195.230.218 | core62007-gw.customer.alter.net

-snip-

  To me, it looks like the customer has no internal route for
this address and is defaulting to UUnet. The customer's default is
the cause of the apparent loop, not anything UUnet is doing.

  Judging by the various toad.net hops before the loop becomes
apparent, this may be caused by route instability inside the customer's
network. Either way, this is not a UUnet issue.

  Their policies aside, I'm not sure what you want them to do about
this. Incidentally, normal UNIX-style traceroute formats much better for
email.

  --msa