Unacceptable Delay

It's interesting to note the delay in the NANOG mailer. I don't know if
there's any manual operation involved, but according to the headers, Rob
posted this at 7:43, it was received at 7:43 pdt by MERIT, and shipped
out at 8:15 pdt.

I guess we're lucky this isn't an operational list, where time might be
important :wink:

Can we improve this?

Rodney Joffe
Chief Technology Officer
Genuity Inc., a Bechtel company

Received: from postal1.genuity.net by x-files.genuity.net with SMTP
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1458.49)
  id 3T51M8BZ; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 08:15:13 -0700
Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [])
  by postal1.genuity.net (Sendmail G2.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id
  Fri, 11 Jul 1997 15:15:28 GMT
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
  by merit.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA15550;
  Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:49:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by merit.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:43:51
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
  by merit.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA15338
  for nanog-outgoing; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:43:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from elite.exodus.net (rob@elite.exodus.net [])
  by merit.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA15331
  for <nanog@merit.edu>; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:43:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from rob@localhost) by elite.exodus.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
HAA04422 for nanog@merit.edu; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 07:43:52 -0700
Message-Id: <199707111443.HAA04422@elite.exodus.net>

I would say a lot of the delay is in packet loss.. with MW down, ME is
really loaded at this time.. I get as much as 60% packet loss just pinging
across the Ring. OUCH!