Scott Bradner writes:
>> ICANN* bmanning@karoshi.com (bmanning@karoshi.com) [Fri 03 Oct 2003, 16:47 CEST]:
> This is a return volly. The service in this match was three
> weeks ago.So the question is now, who has who by the jugulars in this threesome
between ICANN, VeriSign and the Internet technical community? Or worded
even more clearly, who controls/owns who - VeriSign ICANN and the
Internet, or we ICANN and therefore VeriSign enough to not matter?-- Niels.
as I understand it:
the "internet technical community" has no part in this matter. (*)
there are a series of interlocking MOUs/CRADAs/Contracts between
ICANN/USDOC/Verisign that cover a range of topics, some of which
include the on-going care/feeding of .com and .net. (*) we get
to watch this match from the sidelines.
(*) as a community (technical and otherwise) we do get to "vote" with our
editors or in conjuntion w/ our vendors. with enough disgust/distaste
it is possible either lie to ones self and ones customers/clients about
what has been done (aka the BIND patch), to abandon .com/.net (easier
said than done), let mob-rule anoint others to be the authoritative
source for .com/.net. -or- accept the changes and get on w/ life.
pick one of the four.
--bill