Sub-optimal routing to Google via IPv6

I have noticed that since we deployed IPv6 a number of years ago, that our
IPv6 routes to Google's V6-enabled sites (e.g. www.google.com and
www.youtube.com) traverse the CONUS from Oakland (where our primary Level 3
ISP connection is) to Washington D.C., New York, and then onto Google's
network in New York, where the packets presumably pass across Google's
internal networks.

                                       My traceroute [v0.71]

hivemind (::slight_smile:
Thu Feb 26 18:03:44 2015

Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit

                                                                  Packets
            Pings

Host Loss% Last
  Avg Best Wrst StDev

1. 2620:79:0:xxxx::ff7d 0.0% 0.4
  0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0

2. 2620:79:0:xxxx::fd 0.0% 0.4
  0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0

3. 2620:79:0:xxxx::249 0.0% 1.7
  1.7 1.7 1.7 0.0

4. ge-6-24.car1.Oakland1.Level3.net 0.0% 316.3
316.3 316.3 316.3 0.0

5. vl-4043.edge1.SanJose1.Level3.net 0.0% 3.0
  3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0

6. vl-4045.edge5.LosAngeles.Level3.net 0.0% 9.3
  9.3 9.3 9.3 0.0

7. vl-4081.edge6.LosAngeles1.Level3.net 0.0% 9.2
  9.2 9.2 9.2 0.0

8. vl-4041.edge1.Washington1.Level3.net 0.0% 116.5
116.5 116.5 116.5 0.0

9. vl-4080.edge2.Washington1.Level3.net 0.0%
75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 0.0

10. vl-4068.edge2.Washington12.Level3.net 0.0%
75.5 75.5 75.5 75.5 0.0

11. vl-4047.car1.NewYork1.Level3.net 0.0%
76.5 76.5 76.5 76.5 0.0

12. vl-60.ear2.NewYork1.Level3.net 0.0% 110.2
110.2 110.2 110.2 0.0

13. Google-level3-30GB.NewYork1.Level3.net 0.0%
75.6 75.6 75.6 75.6 0.0

14. 2001:4860::1:0:3be 0.0%
76.1 76.1 76.1 76.1 0.0

15. 2001:4860::8:0:4397 0.0%
75.9 75.9 75.9 75.9 0.0

16. 2001:4860::8:0:5901 0.0%
73.5 73.5 73.5 73.5 0.0

17. 2001:4860::8:0:7894 0.0%
85.9 85.9 85.9 85.9 0.0

18. 2001:4860::8:0:79e5 0.0%
92.9 92.9 92.9 92.9 0.0

19. 2001:4860::8:0:6117 0.0%
73.5 73.5 73.5 73.5 0.0

20. 2001:4860::1:0:7ea 0.0%
71.9 71.9 71.9 71.9 0.0

21. 2001:4860:0:1::691 0.0%
72.1 72.1 72.1 72.1 0.0

22. ???

I haven't raised this issue with Level(3) yet, as I was wondering if this
is really a Level(3) routing issue or a Google IPv6 routing issue?

Thank for any insights.

Regards,
David Sotnick