Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 18:22:19 -0500
From: Jon Meek <email@example.com>
I use iperf with packet capture on both sides, then analyze the packet
capture for per-second throughput and re-transmits. I usually do 10
TCP streams for 30 seconds.
Note that on GigE with significant RTTs (5-15 ms) some TCP tuning is
needed to deal with the bandwidth delay product. It is also possible
that Ethernet drivers will have an effect. Local testing of the pair
of test machines should be done if you can't get to about 980 Mbps on
a Gig link (keeping in mind the comment about TCP tuning as latency
> Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results when testing at 10/100/1000 Ethernet speeds?
> Do you have a server/software that customer can test too?
I'll also suggest http://fasterdata.es.net as a resource for network
tuning. Tuning TCP is hard. UDP is simple, but some things can even
Many less than obvious things can have a huge impact on high-speed data
transfer. The choice of congestion algorithms can be very
significant. As anyone who has used bittorrent should have noticed,
having multiple TCP streams works better than a single stream.
An oddity we have noted is that some routers will process switch layer
2 traffic if a layer 3 interface exists on the port even if it is
unconfigured and unused. Man, that kills performance, even in low
FWIW, we use mostly iperf, but may be biased as the iperf maintainer
works here. We did start using iperf before we hired him, though.