SORBS lies and new location for SORBS discussions

I wrote a response to his message, but the details are rather redundant
because no reasonable people have ever beleived them.

So, I will instead post Sullivan's messages to www.iadl.org. Since
possibly Nanog doesn't want to hear about all SORBS complaints, they can
be forwarded there for posting. I'll set up a mailing list tomorrow with
instructions on the site.

BTW, this should pretty conclusively refute Browns/Sullivans' lies. (not
that any reasonable people ever believed them.)

dig ns camb.opengroup.org

; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> ns camb.opengroup.org
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 34403
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;camb.opengroup.org. IN NS

;; ANSWER SECTION:
camb.opengroup.org. 10800 IN NS ns1.camb.opengroup.org.
camb.opengroup.org. 10800 IN NS ns2.camb.opengroup.org.
camb.opengroup.org. 10800 IN NS xopen.xopen.co.uk.
camb.opengroup.org. 10800 IN NS xopuk.xopen.co.uk.
camb.opengroup.org. 10800 IN NS concorde.av8.com.

What is that there: concorde.av8.com? How odd. Surely, it couldn't be
that Sullivan is lying....

Of course, most people just see that OSF/The Open Group still exist, and
that they have reported any space as being stolen.

    --Dean