skype seems to have made the latest 6.x incompatible with 2.8 (which
folk who care about screen real estate run) in that video no longer
works between them.
until widespread availability of webrtc, a bunch of us are using
jitsi for video, https://jitsi.org/
o uses open standard protocols
o free, open source, apple pie, ...
o supports opus codec which has really good performance across a
wide range of bandwidth http://www.opus-codec.org/comparison/
o multi-participant video on xmpp-based videobridge, also open
source
o does xmpp, sip, aim, icq, yahoo, ...
i have an ejabberd+videobridge up if folk want test/use accounts.
and it's easy to put up your own, of course.
skype seems to have made the latest 6.x incompatible with 2.8 (which
folk who care about screen real estate run) in that video no longer
works between them.
until widespread availability of webrtc, a bunch of us are using
jitsi for video, https://jitsi.org/
o uses open standard protocols
o free, open source, apple pie, ...
o supports opus codec which has really good performance across a
wide range of bandwidth Comparison – Opus Codec
o multi-participant video on xmpp-based videobridge, also open
source
o does xmpp, sip, aim, icq, yahoo, ...
And last I tried it, it kept segfaulting on something dumb
Nice to see it supports opus though. And I really wish the FOSS software
in this space didn't suck so much.
i have an ejabberd+videobridge up if folk want test/use accounts.
and it's easy to put up your own, of course.