Saudi Telecom sending route with invalid attributes 212.118.142.0/24

Hello,

anyone else getting a route for 212.118.142.0/24 with invalid
attributes? Seems this is (again) causing problems with some (older)
routers/software.

               Announcement bits (4): 0-KRT 3-KRT 5-Resolve tree 1
6-Resolve tree 2
                AS path: 6453 39386 25019 I Unrecognized Attributes: 39
bytes
                AS path: Attr flags e0 code 80: 00 00 fd 88 40 01 01 02
40 02 04 02 01 5b a0 c0 11 04 02 01 fc da 80 04 04 00 00 00 01 40 05 04
00 00 00 64
                Accepted Multipath

-Jonas

Hi!

anyone else getting a route for 212.118.142.0/24 with invalid
attributes? Seems this is (again) causing problems with some (older)
routers/software.

              Announcement bits (4): 0-KRT 3-KRT 5-Resolve tree 1
6-Resolve tree 2
               AS path: 6453 39386 25019 I Unrecognized Attributes: 39
bytes
               AS path: Attr flags e0 code 80: 00 00 fd 88 40 01 01 02
40 02 04 02 01 5b a0 c0 11 04 02 01 fc da 80 04 04 00 00 00 01 40 05 04
00 00 00 64
               Accepted Multipath

Exactly the same here.

Sep 8 20:24:04 BBD-RC02 rpd[1334]: Received BAD update from 94.228.128.57 (External AS 41887), aspath_attr():3472 PA4_TYPE_ATTRSET(128) => 1 times IGNORED, family inet-unicast(1), prefix 212.118.142.0/24

Bye,
Raymond.

Yup! We're seeing the same thing too, and we're filtering it out.
Originating AS is 25019

-Clay

Is this announcement still showing up this way (no easy way to check
myself).

-Kyle

Is this announcement still showing up this way (no easy way to check
myself).

ripe ris?

Looks like the RIS collectors are seeing it originating mostly from
STC and KACST ASNs:
<http://stat.ripe.net/212.118.142.0/24>

Some of the "show ip bgp" reports on that screen are also showing
AS8866 "BTC-AS Bulgarian Telecommunication Company". Not sure what's
up with that.

--Richard

with in the span of couple of hours this prefix was originated from 3 ASN
i.e. AS3561 (Savvis), AS8866 (BTC) and AS25019 (STC original custodians).

As per the STC it was orginated by one of their customer having Juniper
router. but I still don't understand why/how they are adv this prefix with
unrecog transitive attributes.

Can any one suggest.

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui

with in the span of couple of hours this prefix was originated from 3 ASN
i.e. AS3561 (Savvis), AS8866 (BTC) and AS25019 (STC original custodians).

As per the STC it was orginated by one of their customer having Juniper
router. but I still don't understand why/how they are adv this prefix with
unrecog transitive attributes.

For example, AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE and/or AS_CONFED_SET in AS4_PATH again..;(

Could be this..?

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.2/topics/reference/configuration-statement/independent-domain-edit-routing-options.html

"unrecognized transitive attributes" depend on whatever code version you are running... What's more important is how the unrecoginized attribute is handled. Ideally you accept and pass the route and log it. The problem is with devices that aren't so graceful.. dropping sessions and wreaking havoc:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100827-bgp.shtml

--Heather

Actually just started seeing these problems again today. Is anyone else seeing this today from something other than 212.118.142.0/24? Looks like it started about two hours ago.

Regards,
Ryan Gray
Long Lines
www.longlines.com

Seeing it again here too.. Has anyone contacted them?

..and for folks who are choosing to blackhole the prefix in order to supress the route, please remember not to export it!

AS25019 SAUDINETSTC-AS Autonomus System Number for SaudiNet 2011-09-08 18:23:53 UTC 2011-09-19 19:16:27 UTC
AS8866 BTC-AS Bulgarian Telecommunication Company Plc. 2011-09-08 18:35:14 UTC 2011-09-19 19:15:42 UTC
AS10026 PACNET Pacnet Global Ltd 2011-09-11 02:41:40 UTC 2011-09-19 16:00:00 UTC
AS8767 MNET-AS M-net AS 2011-09-14 12:13:01 UTC 2011-09-14 12:14:00 UTC
AS3561 SAVVIS - Savvis 2011-09-09 19:42:15 UTC 2011-09-10 16:27:18 UTC
AS3549 GBLX Global Crossing Ltd. 2011-09-09 16:13:15 UTC 2011-09-09 17:05:38 UTC
AS1239 SPRINTLINK - Sprint 2011-09-09 03:18:28 UTC 2011-09-09 15:56:41 UTC
AS65000 -Private Use AS- 2011-09-08 18:34:28 UTC 2011-09-08 18:34:29 UTC

--heather

In the off chance that no one already attempted an email to the folks
nominally in charge there:

person: Hejji almazroua
address: SaudiNet
address: P.O.Box: 295997, Riyadh 11351, Saudi Arabia.
phone: +9661 218 0300
fax-no: +9661 218 0311
e-mail: info@irnetco.net
nic-hdl: Ha125-RIPE
mnt-by: irnetco-ripe-mnt
source: RIPE # Filtered

person: Suliman I. Al-Zain
address: Saudi Telecom Co. (SaudiNet)
address: P.O.Box: 295997, Riyadh 11351, Saudi Arabia.
phone: +9661 218 2034
fax-no: +9661 218 0311
e-mail: suliman.alzain@saudi.net.sa
nic-hdl: SA702-RIPE
source: RIPE # Filtered

Do the Saudi-Telecom folks have a method to suppress the /24
(212.118.142.0/24) which is also covered by: 212.118.128.0/19

it'd really help lots of other Internet folk if you'd suppress this /24 ...

-chris

suliman.alzain@saudi.net.sa - bounces :frowning: Ripe folks (if listening)
perhaps you could ping the other live POC's there and request an
update? :slight_smile:

Hi Chris,

I've send an email to the person I know within STC responsible for
international transit.

Let's hope he can assist.

Regards,
Erik Bais

Hi Chris,

I've send an email to the person I know within STC responsible for
international transit.

Let's hope he can assist.

excellent! :slight_smile:

I got an email response on 11th Sep when made a complaint for the same, they
said, it is one of our customer's prefix. THATS IT.

They didn't share any reason for rogue attributes, for them it is more
likely a Juniper box their client is using.

Very helpfull info though :slight_smile:

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui