Routing wars pending?

Mailman List Mirror (Read Only)
1

Absolutely agree with both Robert and Vadim that DNS need to be revised
in a big way. I especially would like to see the MX record concept
applied to information services (IX maybe), i.e.

foo.bar.org. IN A 198.133.151.19
      IX 10 fooU2.bar.org.
      IX 20 foo2U2.bar.org.
      IX 30 whoU2.maybe.com.
      IX 40 tryMe2.friendly.com.

www.bar.org. IN CNAME foo.bar.org.

Has this simple concept been proposed in an IETF draft unknown to
us ugly ducklings :slight_smile:

Quack.

Tim

2

... the MX record concept applied to information services
  [Example removed]
   Has this simple concept been proposed in an IETF draft unknown to
   us ugly ducklings :slight_smile:

Yes. See draft-gulbrandsen-dns-rr-srvcs-01.txt at a repository near you.

  -MAP