Something like this can be seen on www.airow.com:
$ dig www.airow.com @a.gtld-servers.net
...
looks good to me, man.
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> @f.6to4-servers.net www.airow.com a
; (2 servers found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; www.airow.com, type = A, class = IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.airow.com. 2D IN A 66.82.206.10
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
airow.com. 2D IN NS ns1.rfwwp.com.
airow.com. 2D IN NS www.airow.com.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.rfwwp.com. 2D IN A 208.191.129.185
;; Total query time: 37 msec
;; FROM: stick.isc.org to SERVER: f.6to4-servers.net 2001:4f8:0:2::14
;; WHEN: Wed Sep 17 14:31:48 2003
;; MSG SIZE sent: 31 rcvd: 101
After delegation-only, they will start to return
208.191.129.189. Which is probably an improvement, but a change no
less.
see above.
So I'm unsure about ISC's approach.
me too.