RE: Statements against new.net?

From: Stephen Stuart [mailto:stuart@mfnx.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 8:53 AM

> IIRC, there was an "issue" around the assignment of
16.1.16.1; I don't
> think lawyers had been invented back then, so the scope of
the scandal
> remained relatively small.
>
> (The coolness factor was the binary representation, of course.)

Sorry, it was the hex representation, of course.

HEX:=="313631313631"
Leet:="ELEBELELEBEL"

Sorry, I just don't get it ... Is there another coding overlay?

16.1.16.1 = 0x10011001

regards,
Daniel

I think the intended value was 0x10011001

Hex: 10011001
Bin: 10000000000010001000000000001

Best Regards,

Simon Higgs