I would support that.
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities-03
How would you modify it?
To me, that draft looks hugely complicated, like everything you
could possibly think of was thrown in. I would support a simplified
version (and be able to code it without bugs) if it contained just useful stuff.
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities-03
To me, that draft looks hugely complicated, like everything you
could possibly think of was thrown in.
<aol>
do we have a chat with robert or push an alternative so that the wg is
pushed to compromise?
randy
i get the impression that Robert realises that the current draft is
unworkably complicated.
Nick
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities-03
To me, that draft looks hugely complicated, like everything you
could possibly think of was thrown in.<aol>
do we have a chat with robert or push an alternative so that the wg is
pushed to compromise?
The token to simplify is currently mine. The messy bit was an attempt to try to push policy algebra into the packet format. A hallway conversation with a certain German gentleman helped disabuse me about the wisdom of doing that.
Cleaning up the document will take probably another two rounds but a terse description of where it should be going is "template based structured communities".
-- Jeff
The token to simplify is currently mine. The messy bit was an attempt
to try to push policy algebra into the packet format.
jeezus!
Cleaning up the document will take probably another two rounds but a
terse description of where it should be going is "template based
structured communities".
second system syndrome