RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck)

Deepak Jain wrote:
With a network boot OS for each POP, you can do
version control much much more easily.

This is seriously flawed, IMHO. I'd encourage my competitors to do it:
after the master image gets corrupted all it takes is a bozo tripping
the right circuit breaker and the entire POP is kaput.

QOS, priority/custom queueing are all KERNEL/underlying
OS functions.

This also is flawed, IMHO. What if you want to do queing or QOS based on


You buy a OSM from Cisco and you can queue and do QoS based upon bgp index
or AS

                            Scott C. McGrath