RE: NANOG Changes


Let me correct a mischaracterization. I have nothing to do
with any technical or administrative issue on nanog-futures.
I'm just a poster like anyone else.

As far as the nanog-futures archive goes? You'd think it
would be a relatively simple operation to add something that's
missing. How about just resending it as a "historical
note" and if some person feels really strongly that it
must be authenticated, by all means, PGP sign it.