> BTW, I consider RFC2870 antiquated
Is it antiquated because it does not use the Roeland Meyer
definition of
"root server"?
No, it is antiquated because of the reasons which I stated, and you cut out.
> BTW, I consider RFC2870 antiquated
Is it antiquated because it does not use the Roeland Meyer
definition of
"root server"?
No, it is antiquated because of the reasons which I stated, and you cut out.