RE: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up

..and of course:

"Cisco Denies Router Vulnerability Claims"

[snip]

Cisco Systems is downplaying a news story that suggests new security flaws may have been discovered in some of its routers.

[snip]

http://www.varbusiness.com/components/weblogs/article.jhtml?articleId=166403151

So, until the _facts_ come out, this appears to be spin vs. spin
(a play on spy v. spy, for all you Alfred E. Newman fans)...

- ferg

...and Wired News is running this story:

"Cisco Security Hole a Whopper"

Excerpt:

[snip]

A bug discovered in an operating system that runs the majority of the world's computer networks would, if exploited, allow an attacker to bring down the nation's critical infrastructure, a computer security researcher said Wednesday against threat of a lawsuit.

Michael Lynn, a former research analyst with Internet Security Solutions, quit his job at ISS Tuesday morning before disclosing the flaw at Black Hat Briefings, a conference for computer security professionals held annually here.

[snip]

http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,68328,00.html

- ferg

For what ot's worth, this story is running in the
popular trade press:

"Cisco nixes conference session on hacking IOS router code"
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/072705-cisco-ios.html

- ferg

Cisco's response thus far:

   http://www.cisco.com/en/US/about/security/intelligence/MySDN_CiscoIOS.html

Jeff

Since the talk was actually delivered - does anyone have a transcript or a
torrent for audio/video?

- Dan

I have been searching the net since this morning, for �The Holy Grail: Cisco IOS Shellcode Remote Execution�, or variations of such. This seems to be - at the moment - the most thought after torrent ...

Stef
Network Fortius, LLC

More fuel on the fire... Cisco and ISS are suing Lynn now...

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/security/0,39020375,39211011,00.htm

Not the first time Cisco has had a highly questionable attitude toward
security issues, even recently: http://kerneltrap.org/node/5382
(cisco, lawyers, and patents).

Is this the start of a new pattern of behavior for cisco, or just more of
the same?

-Dan