Hi Randy,
> I might be wrong, but I thought an image with IPv6 support required
> 16 MB flash on the 2500?could be. don't care. don't need ipv6 on terminal servers
for oob access.
But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices... Networking, Cloud, and Cybersecurity Solutions - Cisco
Why don't you care?
Chris
But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices...
Networking, Cloud, and Cybersecurity Solutions - Cisco
the general problem is definitely wider than the v6 hole. i
believe, but of course could be wrong, that the april fix was a
bit wider than v6.
the blackhat/nanog problem is that, if we are not allowed to
discuss these things openly, all is conjecturbation.
randy
The "nanog problem" was clearly stated. It had nothing to do with the
specific discussion, but more that the discussion contained
instances where folks were being insulting and crude.
Tim Rainier
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu
08/02/2005 03:39 PM
To
"Chris Ranch" <CRanch@Affinity.com>
cc
Bj�rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>, "Christopher L. Morrow"
<christopher.morrow@mci.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Subject
RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon....
But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices...
Networking, Cloud, and Cybersecurity Solutions - Cisco
the general problem is definitely wider than the v6 hole. i
believe, but of course could be wrong, that the april fix was a
bit wider than v6.
the blackhat/nanog problem is that, if we are not allowed to
discuss these things openly, all is conjecturbation.
randy
I forget who suggested it
actually, i was first, but others have followed
but I like the request to move this to cisco-nsp. Any reason
that isn't a better place than NANOG at this stage?
i would guess that, if useful discussion is started on cisco-nsp,
that the momentum will move there and attenuate here. but, imiho,
shutting folk down here first is not a useful social path.
randy
The "nanog problem" was clearly stated. It had nothing to do with the
specific discussion, but more that the discussion contained instances
where folks were being insulting and crude.
then address the insults and crudeness.
randy