RE: An example of reverse-hijack (was: yet another dns n ames pace overlay play)

After reviewing my post, I must admit, that this thread was ICANN decisions,
not NS/the Courts. Of course ICANN was involved in the legislation, so the
content of my previous email is at least partially valid. I could bring up
that I applied for the use of ".BIZ" in 1995 and that somehow all these
other registrars now have the rights to it, despite the fact they applied
for that right several years later. Alas, that's a different topic for
another day.

Cheers all.