Qwest reporting widespread DSL outages

Happy Thanksgiving...

According to a support person at Qwest's DSL Technical Support
number (800-247-7285), Qwest is experiencing widespread intermittent
loss of connectivity for DSL customers (symptomology is a customer's
Cisco 675 or 678 will report loss of WAN physical layer, link will
then come back up after a brief period of time, problem repeats).
This is occurring even for customers running CBOS 2.4.3 (Qwest's
currently recommended CBOS revision, per
http://www.qwest.com/dsl/customerservice/csco675ups.html ).

This has been going on (according to the Qwest technical support
person) for multiple hours, and Qwest has no further information.
Qwest suggests DSL customers contact their ISP for further information
(although it is clear that this is not an ISP-level issue at time time).

No Qwest web page or other information about the outage is available
according to the Qwest support person.

Regards,

Joe St Sauver (joe@oregon.uoregon.edu)
University of Oregon Computing Center

Disclaimer: the preceding is not, of course, an official Qwest
announcement and your milage may vary.

This has been going on (according to the Qwest technical support
person) for multiple hours, and Qwest has no further information.
Qwest suggests DSL customers contact their ISP for further information
(although it is clear that this is not an ISP-level issue at time time).

Maybe Qwest was jealous of BT's DSL network meltdown, and wanted to show
they can break a network better. Two DSL networks meltdown in the same
week?

No Qwest web page or other information about the outage is available
according to the Qwest support person.

According to http://stat.qwest.net/ Qwest and TouchAmerica have 100%
uptime for the last 90 days.

[deleted text]

According to http://stat.qwest.net/ Qwest and TouchAmerica have 100%
uptime for the last 90 days.

I'm not running to any telco-conglomerates' defense, but I think it is
safe to assume that legacy-Qwest national IP backbone (read: ex-IconNET,
AS209) is quite different than legacy-SBC IP net.

No?