> Many thanks to my friend & cow-orker Tristan Horn for this
> idea...in BIND 8 you can define servers as bogus (meaning
> "don't ever trust these") as follows:
>
> // [fjkl].root-servers.net
> server 192.5.5.241 { bogus yes; };
> server 198.41.0.10 { bogus yes; };
> server 193.0.14.129 { bogus yes; };
> server 198.32.64.12 { bogus yes; };i recommend against that.
Do you recommend against this particular way of telling BIND to
temporarily ignore name servers which are known to be a little, errr, funky?
Or do you recommend against ignoring broken name servers in general?..
I guess what I really would like to know is how did you handle this
problem? 
Just wondering,
--------Scott.