Portability of 206 address space


This stemmed from a 'what *is* portable?' discussion. I believe its
relevant in NANOG, regardless of overlap into an IETF WG topic.

In any event (and to open old wounds), I *liked* the addr-ownership
draft and believed it should've been advanced as BCP, but I digress.
Whether or not there was consensus that it should have been adopted
and advanced is not relevant; the topics it discussed surely are.

- paul

The topic is discussed in more detail in