Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations

Well, i meant precisely the city loops which aren't multihomed,
and that's what customers are using to access telco facilities.

I.e. POTS customers (and their PBXes) aren't multihomed in the
sense used in the discussion.

The better term for telcos are doing for reliability between
switch sites is called "standby", which is *not* the same as
multihoming with adaptive routing.

The point was that high reliability may be achieved w/o tricky
things like adaptive routing,


From sdenny@red.hex.net Mon Jan 29 21:14:22 1996

Received: from tiny.sprintlink.net (tiny.sprintlink.net []) by titan.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA09936 for <avg@titan.sprintlink.net>; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 21:14:21 -0500
Received: from red.hex.net (sdenny@red.hex.net []) by tiny.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA14645 for <avg@sprint.net>; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 21:14:11 -0500
Received: (from sdenny@localhost) by red.hex.net (8.6.10/8.6.10) id UAA02836; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 20:14:00 -0600
Message-Id: <199601300214.UAA02836@red.hex.net>
In-Reply-To: Vadim Antonov <avg@sprint.net>
       "Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations" (Jan 29, 4:19pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)