Juniper: Who needs to waste time with pathetic marketing videos when you're
gear just works.
You seem to have accidentally put an 'R' between your E and X 
Well...
Seems to be popping up on global NOG lists today.
When you're already in trouble with the wife you go have a beer with your mates.
This campaign got all of you to stop talking about NAT444 and focused on talking about Cisco and Juniper gear.
Hell, if I put my tinfoil hat on, I'd say this was a joint venture by both vendors to get you all to focus on their kit and stop looking at other brands or talking about technology standards.
How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site?
* Does Juniper break promises?
* Does Cisco break them?
* What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?
* What is the best technology for each company?
* Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
...I could go on...
It's 9:20am here and I woke up to a flurry of the worlds leading IP people talking about Cisco and Juniper -
In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site?
Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
* Does Juniper break promises?
Yes.
* Does Cisco break them?
Yes.
* What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?
It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
* What is the best technology for each company?
Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time.
Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
* Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
Yes, but I can't afford it.
Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the
thought of NAT444?
Clearly some hate it enough to go to the trouble of making a 'we think they suck' web site in an attempt to draw readers in a different direction.
Now with respect to your list... I'm sure there will be many that will be quite interested to see it, so Monday?
Beer
D
Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.
Nat444 or frontal labotomy hmm let's see at least with the second I
would still be able to make a living as a micro soft network admin;)
I'm looking forward to the awful experience of NAT444 promoting IPv6.
In NAT444, no one can hear you scream....
That will either be because you exceeded your port count or the RTSP ALG is broken.
need more L3 1u TORs with 4 x 40 and 48 x 10...