One of those pesky legal notice on all my outgoing email gets filtered by Randy’s mail … (the outgoing addition is not under my control)… maybe someone could tell him for me (as I can’t email him…)
>you have sent a message to me which seems to contain a legal
>warning on who can read it, or how it may be distributed, or
>whether it may be archived, etc.
>i do not accept such email. my mail user agent detected a legal
>notice when i was opening your mail, and automatically deleted it.
>so do not expect further response.
>yes, i know your mail environment automatically added the legal
>notice. well, my mail environment automatically detected it,
>deleted it, and sent this message to you. so don't expect a lot
>of sympathy.
>randy
Sam Crooks wrote:
One of those pesky legal notice on all my outgoing email gets filtered by Randy's mail ... (the outgoing addition is not under my control).... maybe someone could tell him for me (as I can't email him...)
>you have sent a message to me which seems to contain a legal
>warning on who can read it, or how it may be distributed, or
>whether it may be archived, etc.
>i do not accept such email. my mail user agent detected a legal
>notice when i was opening your mail, and automatically deleted it.
>so do not expect further response.
>yes, i know your mail environment automatically added the legal
>notice. well, my mail environment automatically detected it,
>deleted it, and sent this message to you. so don't expect a lot
>of sympathy.
>randy
When/If nanog implements content filtering I vote randy's anti-legal spam gets included.
fwiw, i have just added
and if you choose to work for some enterprise clueless enough to
think that they can force this silliness on the world, use gmail,
hotmail, ...
to my anti-legal notice
randy