http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100409_oecd_reports_on_state_of_ipv6_deployment_for_policy_makers/
karine perset's work is, as usual, good enough that it should be seen in
it's original, not some circle-je^h^hid hack of a small part of it.
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/8/44961688.pdf
randy
karine perset's work is, as usual, good enough that it should be seen in
it's original, not some circle-je^h^hid hack of a small part of it.
On of the best parts of her presentation:
"Government’s role *is not about regulation*, but about working with
technical experts and business to:
•Role 1: Build awareness of issue & help to ease bottlenecks through
multi-stakeholder co-operation.
•Role 2: Being early adopters.
•Role 3: International co-operation and helping to monitor progress of
deployment."
Will they get it any day ?
Regards
Jorge
You should have seen the CNN experiment on cyber attack...
It took 3/4 of the time for the "government" to realize they need to ask the private sector to help them. The first 3/4 were spent to discuss what the president can do or not do so they can take over the infrastructure and tell the operators what to do...
You should have seen the CNN experiment on cyber attack...
you mean the failed chertoff/cheney wanna make the news clueless crap?
puhleeze! the fcc has more guns than that mob had clue.
randy
Nasty, degenerate, foot-dragging U.S. of A. does it again.
unfortunately, the failed chertoff/cheney celebrants of the
"cybersecurity" cult have managed one significant outplacement.
eric
John,
I'd like to call your attention to slide 8, the chart showing growth
in fully working IPv6 deployments. Should that growth trend be allowed
to continue, IPv4-only deployments can be expected to fall into the
minority after another few hundred years.
The upcoming conversion of IPv4 addressing into a zero-sum game (as a
result of free pool depletion) is likely to increase this growth
trend, but it's anybody's guess whether the new growth trend improves
to something with a faster-than-linear feedback loop. And of course
once free pool depletion hits, the cost to deploy additional IPv4
systems starts to grow immediately, independent of pre-majority IPv6
growth.
We might want to consider additional public policy incentives to kick
the IPv6 growth rate into a higher gear.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
karine perset's work is, as usual, good enough that it should be seen in
it's original, not some circle-je^h^hid hack of a small part of it.John,
I'd like to call your attention to slide 8, the chart showing growth
in fully working IPv6 deployments. Should that growth trend be allowed
to continue, IPv4-only deployments can be expected to fall into the
minority after another few hundred years.The upcoming conversion of IPv4 addressing into a zero-sum game (as a
result of free pool depletion) is likely to increase this growth
trend, but it's anybody's guess whether the new growth trend improves
to something with a faster-than-linear feedback loop. And of course
once free pool depletion hits, the cost to deploy additional IPv4
systems starts to grow immediately, independent of pre-majority IPv6
growth.
In fact, IPv6 is already showing greater than linear acceleration in
deployment, so, even though IPv4 hasn't run out yet, people are
beginning to catch on.
We might want to consider additional public policy incentives to kick
the IPv6 growth rate into a higher gear.
Such as?
Owen
Notify all holders of a currently active AS they have been
allocated/assigned a /32. No fees. No questions.
To accept the allocation/assignment, it must be advertised within a 24
month period.
There is no shortage of available /32s in 2000::/3. There is a serious
shortage of meaningful deployment.
I'm puzzled as to why you might think that this would incentivise
meaningful deployment of ipv6.
Nick
It removes the hurdle of working with the RIR and/or getting
management buy-in to go negotiate for number resources.
(Our personal experience as a community/end-user network is that ARIN
wants justification for the minimum address space one can live with.
At this early stage of deployment, that raises concerns over whether
we have a workable address plan in place. We worked with ARIN to
eventually get a /41 assigned. With the prospect of assigning /56s to
every customer port we have on an edge switch, that's not going to
last long. You can probably argue we got the initial request wrong,
but it still means we have to go back and negotiate again, which we
haven't found to be much fun. That's holding us back.)