New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greetings,

This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
one (1) IPv4 /8 block to AfriNIC:

41/8 AfriNIC

For a full list of IANA IPv4 allocations please see:

<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space>

This is the first allocation to AfriNIC after their recent recognition as a
Regional Internet Registry. The ICANN staff would like to offer its
congratulations to AfriNIC for this significant achievement.

- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

Would you (read: IANA) also be so kind and give them a nice chunk out
of:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments

I guess and am most likely wrong, that many ISP's will be starting out
there and buying their equipment now, which, if they are able to get
IPv6 too at the same time would give a nice incentive to check out the
hardware that does IPv6, bringing Africa directly into the 21st
century :slight_smile:

If I divided the list correctly, though based on continent, not on RIR
region, there should be a number of IPv6 ISP's already as per:
http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/tla/all/?continent=africa

Btw, is there going to be an LACNIC-alike system for transfering
RIPE/ARIN resources to AfriNIC?

Greets,
Jeroen

Jeroen Massar wrote:

This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
one (1) IPv4 /8 block to AfriNIC:

41/8 AfriNIC

Would you (read: IANA) also be so kind and give them a nice chunk out
of:

IPv6 Global Unicast Address Assignments

There is already a /23 in 2001::/16 that has AfriNIC's name on it, you'll be hearing more about that tomorr... errr... later today. Allocations of larger IPv6 blocks are still handled on a case by case basis until there is a global IPv6 allocation policy developed in the manner described by the new ASO MOU. A new draft of such a policy will be discussed at ARIN's meeting in Orlando next week.

Btw, is there going to be an LACNIC-alike system for transfering
RIPE/ARIN resources to AfriNIC?

I wouldn't characterize it exactly that way, but resources that have been held in trust and/or managed by the other RIRs in anticipation of an African RIR will be transferred. The details of those arrangements are primarily administrative matters, and while ICANN is happy to assist if necessary, we have confidence that the RIRs will work this out in due time.

Regards,

Doug

a message of 49 lines which said:

Btw, is there going to be an LACNIC-alike system for transfering
RIPE/ARIN resources to AfriNIC?

AFAIK, all inetnums belonging to Africa in the RIPE-NCC database have
already been transferred (I don't know for ARIN):

% whois -h whois.ripe.net 217.64.96.0
% This is the RIPE Whois query server #2.
% The objects are in RPSL format.
%
% Rights restricted by copyright.
% See http://www.ripe.net/db/copyright.html

inetnum: 217.64.96.0 - 217.64.111.255
org: ORG-AFNC1-RIPE
netname: AFRINIC-NET-TRANSFERRED-20050223
descr: This network has been transferred to AFRINIC
remarks: These IP addresses are assigned in the AFRINIC region.
remarks: Authoritative registration information for this network
remarks: is available for query and modification in
remarks: the AFRINIC whois database: whois.afrinic.net or
remarks: web site: http://www.afrinic.net
remarks: The routing registry information (route(6) objects)
remarks: may be published in any Routing Registry, including
remarks: RIPE Whois Database
country: EU # country is really somewhere in African Region
admin-c: AFRI-RIPE
tech-c: AFRI-RIPE
status: ALLOCATED PA
mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
mnt-routes: RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT
changed: hostmaster@ripe.net 20050223
source: RIPE

Thank you for that information. I can leave 41/8 in my router bogon list
and hopefully eliminate the Nigerian 419 problem somewhat.

Personally, I believe we should give them the chance to fail before we
cut them off from the rest of the world. I don't think the majority of
419 email comes from addresses actually sourced in Nigeria.

-Steve

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yo Steve!

Personally, I believe we should give them the chance to fail before we
cut them off from the rest of the world. I don't think the majority of
419 email comes from addresses actually sourced in Nigeria.

Yeah, but the only thing I get from Nigeria is 419s. YMMV. So much so
that my users demanded I block Nigerian IPs. Still, I'll wait until
41/8 is abused before I block it.

RGDS
GARY
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
  gem@rellim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676

This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
one (1) IPv4 /8 block to AfriNIC:

41/8 AfriNIC

To those suggesting a block of 41/8 to stop the Nigerian 419 problem or
any other percieved problem:

C'mon Africa != Nigeria. It's an entire friggin' continent with 53 other
countries besides Nigeria. How does that saying go? "I encourage my
competitors to do this." (Oh yeah, don't forget to block all Chinese IP
addresses while you're at it. That's only one country... :sunglasses: Do you
REALLY think blocking 41/8 will stop those emails?

AfriNIC just received final recognition as the 5th RIR by ICANN a few days
ago after 8 years of hard work. Give 'em a break! See www.afrinic.net

scott

You do know that I was joking, don't you??
Sorry, I didn't know that NANOG has a humor filter on it.

: > To those suggesting a block of 41/8 to stop the Nigerian 419 problem or
: > any other percieved problem:

: You do know that I was joking, don't you??
: Sorry, I didn't know that NANOG has a humor filter on it.

You weren't the only one suggesting it and I was worried there were more
lurking that might consider it. Also, there was no smiley face... :slight_smile:

scott

The largest part (>90%) does originate in Nigeria. The remainder comes
from countries adjacent to Nigeria such as Togo, Senegal, etc (~6%) or
from the Netherlands (~4%)

Unfortunately, the traffic originating in Nigeria comes out on satellite
connections which have established IP ranges assigned to the Satellite
operator and configured as part of his ASN. In other words, they will
mostly match the location of the Satellite downlink - UK, Denmark, or
Israel etc. Typically less than 10% of the traffic from Nigeria uses
IPs assigned on the basis of the network actually being in Nigeria.

The 419 scammers are so used now to port 25 on their own IP addresses
being blocked (either by their own ISP or by the recipient network)
that they have all but given up on direct mailing. Their main methods
are to send through Webmail on a network that doesn't take subscription
security sufficiently seriously (Tiscali, Microsoft Hotmail, etc) or to
use a compromised server such one running PHPNuke webmail.

Leaving 41/8 as a bogon, or otherwise filtering it, will make less than
1% overall difference in the volume of 419-style spam that you receive.
Just for completeness, the "lottery" style scams, which are another form
of Advance Fee Fraud, also originate in Nigeria even though they may
claim to be from people in the UK or in other parts of the EEC.

Just to keep this on topic I will relate the tale of a systems engineer
who I called, to point out the volume of 419 mail coming through their
mailservers. "I can't look at that now", he said, "the current load on
our smarthosts is so high that the mail is backing up - and I have to
get this proposal for four new servers finished for the Board tonight"

Then it suddenly dawned on him why his mail load had become so high ...

I can't speak to the whole world's perceptions, but for 419/aff mail
seen here, the vast majority comes from IPs assigned to the following
ISO country codes:

(africa|AR|BF|BG|BJ|BW|CI|DK|ES|GH|IL|KE|KR|LB|LV|ML|MR|NG|NL|RW|SN|TG|ZA|ZW)

Where 'africa' means "IP space delegated to africa-online.com"
(216.104.192/20).

Also see quite a bit from BR, the occasional one or two from space in
the US, satellite connections, and some from FR. I know this because I
use the Received: and various X-Originating-IP format headers (usually
originating via some compromised or unmonitored webmail software) to
extract the injection IP and reject messages if the source matches the
ISO codes above in a crossref of IP to ISO code or other keyword.

I used to see quite a bit from Australia, but bigpond seems to have
cleaned up its act significantly.

Steve

The largest part (>90%) does originate in Nigeria. The remainder comes
from countries adjacent to Nigeria such as Togo, Senegal, etc (~6%) or
from the Netherlands (~4%)

would love to see the cite for this, please

randy

So we should spank the rest of the *continent* for one countries issues?

> The largest part (>90%) does originate in Nigeria. The remainder comes
> from countries adjacent to Nigeria such as Togo, Senegal, etc (~6%) or
> from the Netherlands (~4%)
would love to see the cite for this, please
randy

I have a collected archive of nearly 1000 nigerian scam emails if anyone
would like to do an analysis.

From what I recall a large % of origin IP (where origin IP is

identifiable) are registered directly to Lagos.

-Dan

No published figures, unfortunately, but based on our own research in
tracking and dealing with hundreds of cases over the last year or so.

The largest part (>90%) does originate in Nigeria. The remainder comes
from countries adjacent to Nigeria such as Togo, Senegal, etc (~6%) or
from the Netherlands (~4%)

So we should spank the rest of the *continent* for one countries issues?

why not? colonialists have been usining such excuses for centuries.

randy

If based on statistics (from 2004), then I think we should block California, New York, Texas and Florida:

http://www.fraud.org/2004-internet%20scams.pdf

Those 4 together exceed all foreign countries for fraud origination.

:slight_smile:

-Hank

John Palmer wrote:

You do know that I was joking, don't you??
Sorry, I didn't know that NANOG has a humor filter on it.

There are too many completely stupid ideas implemented, to know whether
someone is joking, when suggesting a configuration like this.

And there are too many people implementing it, just because it was
suggested on some mailing list or in some magazine.

Nils