new diffserv code point LE PHB

Mailman List Mirror (Read Only)
1

Hi,

I would like to bring attention to the following IETF draft:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-04

I believe this is well under way through the IETF process, and if someone has strong opinions on it they should speak up. I am one of the proponents, as I posted to this list back in 2015:

https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2015-July/077040.html

I think it's a great idea to have a diffserv code point that is supposed to be treated less than best effort (for backup traffic for instance), but it would be nice if someone would be willing to deploy support for it as well.

Thoughts?

2

Dear Mikael,

I would like to bring attention to the following IETF draft:

draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-04

I believe this is well under way through the IETF process, and if someone
has strong opinions on it they should speak up. I am one of the proponents,
as I posted to this list back in 2015:

https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2015-July/077040.html

I think it's a great idea to have a diffserv code point that is supposed to
be treated less than best effort (for backup traffic for instance), but it
would be nice if someone would be willing to deploy support for it as well.

Thoughts?

Do you have configuration examples for common IP carrier platforms on
how to deploy support? Or is support in CPE's, laptops, & CDN caches
sufficient? Are you aware of any software distributors that have
indicated interest in this approach?

In cases where you have both 'normal' and 'bulk' content on the same
webserver, are there any webservers that allow you to set a DSCP value
per path or filename?

Kind regards,

Job

3

Dear Job,

In cases where you have both 'normal' and 'bulk' content on the same

webserver, are there any webservers that allow you to set a DSCP value per
path or filename?

please check http://techgenix.com/qos-windows-server-2012-part3/

You can assign DSCP per (outgoing) URL on Windows Server 2012 (and later).