NAS filed chp 11

http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/020605/200206051047000419_1.html

now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant
about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to
reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company.

-Dan

Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Hollis

now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence
and rant about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how
they will go on to reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger
& better company.

Heh. What I want to see is someone doing that in response to a
Chapter 7 filing. :wink: Sounds silly, but I stood corrected by
many people when I said "that'll be the day" that IWFs freak out
over unreachables...

Hmmmm. Another post that keeps me in the "prolific posters"
list, yet does not help my standing in the "useful contribution"
department. Back to my corner I go.

now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant
about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to
reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company.

I think at this point we are all long past the innocent stage and
rapidly approaching apathy.

- James

I'm certainly a lot less worried than I would be if it was another
form of bankruptcy. Chapter 11 is a reorg, typically.

I won't say it's *good* for the company - and there are too many telecomm
firms filing bankruptcy these days anyhow. It might not be the end of the
world.

...in theory, anyway.

now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant
about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to
reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company.

I think at this point we are all long past the innocent stage and
rapidly approaching apathy.

as our sisters and brothers lose jobs, i doubt either meanness or
apathy are appropriate. do not tempt the fates.

randy