-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I hate to be pedantic but is this something that should get forwarded
to NANOG? I guess the relevance is justified because a lot of network
folks run Nagios...?
Eric Gearhart wrote:
I hate to be pedantic but is this something that should get forwarded
to NANOG? I guess the relevance is justified because a lot of network
folks run Nagios...?
No, it's offtopic. I mean, CVE-2007-5803? Really? Even stranger, they mention a CVE which is 2.x based, and then upgrade the 3.1 packages. heh. I'm not sure who's slipping, mandriva or Gadi.
Jack
srsly?
I didnt find this OT, considering its scope.
Want to dictate policy? Join the MLC.
Till then, /dev/null
thx
pew pew
Eric Gearhart wrote:
pew pew pew
Thanks for the professional response there bud
As long as network operators related vulns don't start showing up every couple of months or so, I think so.