LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want?

i am told that the following session has been accepted for the nanog
agenda.

    A Comparison of Approaches to Loc/ID, Routing Scaling, and the
    Universe

    Abstract:

    This session looks at and contrasts:
      LISP (Dino Farinacci)
      ILNP (Saleem Bhatti)
      RFC 6296 (Fred Baker)

    Where each is explained at an architectural level in some detail
    with a predetermined list of questions such as "how does this
    address loc/id separation, routing table scaling, incremental
    deployment, state of implementation/testing, ..."

    And then a half hour where we all sum up the similarities and
    differences. Maybe it will be worth writing up.

    The goal is education and understanding, not a contest. These are
    all good and interesting approaches. Weapons are not allowed, we all
    work for the Internet.

as you can see, i am interested in
  o loc/id separation
  o rounting table scaling
  o deployability on the internet
  o current state of development

what did i miss? what major attributes interest you?

randy

o Trust model (how much trust is put in whom so that connectivity works)
o How much state where
o Security implications (where are the weak links, vectors for attack)
o Traffic engineering (ingress and egress) features
o Session survivability on rerouting (manual and due to outages)

Best regards,
Daniel

- complexity (define a metric [eek!] ...)
- overhead (who, what, where, why..[closely tied with the "state" question])
- who benefits and who pays? endpoints? backbones ISPs in the DFZ?
SMB? Enterprises? Router companies? ... it's like Lenin said, you
look for the person who will benefit and...

o Trust model (how much trust is put in whom so that connectivity works)
o How much state where
o Security implications (where are the weak links, vectors for attack)
o Traffic engineering (ingress and egress) features
o Session survivability on rerouting (manual and due to outages)

- complexity (define a metric [eek!] ...)

good luck with that one

- overhead (who, what, where, why..[closely tied with the "state"
  question])
- who benefits and who pays? endpoints? backbones ISPs in the DFZ?
  SMB? Enterprises? Router companies? ... it's like Lenin said, you
  look for the person who will benefit and...

i think of this as 'economic model.' what will change from the current
model?

privacy has also been suggested as an issue.

randy