gossip that libya is off net. any actual data?
randy
gossip that libya is off net. any actual data?
randy
I was just looking into this myself.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110218/tc_afp/libyapoliticsunrestinternetfacebook_20110218214522
But I'm still seeing routes announced by AS21003 (Libya Telecom) and http://www.ltt.ly/ loads for me, so if things are blocked they're taking a different approach than Egypt's "SHUT DOWN EVERYTHING" tactic.
In my table right now from LTT, all showing some kind of change about 30 minutes ago:
41.208.64.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100
41.252.0.0/14 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100
41.252.0.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:23:48, MED 100, localpref 100
41.252.64.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:24:46, MED 100, localpref 100
41.252.128.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:23:48, MED 100, localpref 100
41.252.192.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100
41.254.0.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:25:33, MED 100, localpref 100
41.254.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100
41.254.2.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:24:46, MED 100, localpref 100
41.254.3.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100
62.68.32.0/19 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100
62.240.32.0/19 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100
-- Kevin
renesys shows libya is offline..
thanks, craig
luckily, we have no problems like this
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html
randy
And .... they're back, 6h52m later.
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/02/libyan-disconnect-1.shtml
--jim
mm what would we do without these well-functioning blacklists (
http://boingboing.net/2010/09/30/only-17-of-sites-blo.html - 1.7%
accuracy, few minutes work emailing - few hours resolution time -
clearly the blacklists are doing the job well)
Regards,
Martin
Scuttlebutt has it that because of 'political unrest', Formula 1 was going to move the upcoming race from Bahrain to ...umm hmm.
> gossip that libya is off net. any actual data?
>
> randy
>Scuttlebutt has it that because of 'political unrest', Formula 1 was
going to move the upcoming race from Bahrain to
...umm hmm.
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html
And people wonder why I have such deep concerns about RPKI.... how long before something like this happens with prefix certificates... ooops... we revoked a few thousand certs for a few thousand prefix's because they happened to have the servers serving 84 thousand domains we shut down by accident....
Nice.... real nice...
Andrew
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html
And people wonder why I have such deep concerns about RPKI.
there are a thousand means. the problem lies with the intent.
randy
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html
And people wonder why I have such deep concerns about RPKI.
there are a thousand means. the problem lies with the intent.
Agreed... doesn't mean its a great idea to create an even easier way to screw up...
Andrew
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html
And people wonder why I have such deep concerns about RPKI.
there are a thousand means. the problem lies with the intent.
Yes. Remember what happened to Youtube because of (a) a government's intent, and (b) the lack of RPKI.
--Steve Bellovin, Steven M. Bellovin
yes
This is true.
But since no one ever seems to be RFC 3514[1] compliant, it's necessary
to attempt to intuit intent from behavior.
This works equally poorly in nearly all arenas.
Cheers,
-- jr 'capability creep is a bitch' a
[1] pleased to discover that my memory served up the correct number on
the first try.