large organization nameservers sending icmp packets to dns servers.

I suspect that the origin of the myth that DNS/TCP is more
  dangerous than DNS/UDP is that the first root expliot of
  named was over TCP not UDP. There were later exploits that
  were UDP only which totally busted the myth but it continues
  to live.

  Mark

In article <200708100143.l7A1hNSY034263@drugs.dv.isc.org> you write:

I suspect that the origin of the myth that DNS/TCP is more
dangerous than DNS/UDP is that the first root expliot of
named was over TCP not UDP. There were later exploits that
were UDP only which totally busted the myth but it continues
to live.

Mark

  Just to make it clear. This was BIND 4/8 code and the bugs
  were addressed in the last millennia.

  To date there are no known root exploits for BIND 9.

  Mark

Because who runs BIND as root anymore?