Keepalives, WAS: NAP/ISP Saturation

From: Vadim Antonov <avg@pluris.com>
>So, since we designed PPP LQM for the 56K, T1 and (new) T3s of 5-6
>years ago (at least a generation in Internet lifetimes), why isn't
>everyone already running it?

Because Morning Star is not cisco? (I'm well aware of PPP features,
btw, having written one implementation myself :slight_smile:

I do not understand this rationale. Could you please elaborate?

Are you saying that the reason we are not using ubiquitous LQM is
because Cisco decided as a company policy not to interoperate with other
vendors?

BTW, I have never worked for Morning Star in any paid capacity; or I'd
be a millionare today :-). I just have an email address there, as I do
at several other sites, both commercial and non-commercial.

WSimpson@UMich.edu
    Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
BSimpson@MorningStar.com
    Key fingerprint = 2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3 59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2