ICANN related question...

We have a customer that purchased a domain through a reseller of
register.com.
The Whois records only point to the actual company and the originating
accredited registrar: register.com.

Does anyone know of any hints to find out who the reseller is? Apparently
Register.com can't supply us with that information.

Just in case anyone is wondering:
Domain ID:D96747839-LROR
Domain Name:GIRLSINCDE.ORG
Created On:21-Apr-2003 18:39:46 UTC
Last Updated On:20-Nov-2013 22:11:57 UTC
Expiration Date:21-Apr-2014 18:39:46 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Register.com, Inc. (R71-LROR)
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:F50A8CB8E137E659
Registrant Name:Lori Cooney
Registrant Organization:Girls Incorporated of Delaware

Sincerely,

Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
F: 610-429-3222

why bother getting rcom to grovel through the records they should have
kept (it happens to reseller model registrars, occasionally i'm asked
if i can help a core registrant find their member (reseller)), just do
a transfer request to another registrar (i'm not volunteering) and get
the registrar-of-record changed.

now you know the (gaining) r-of-r, and the (gaining) reseller (if any),
and you're free to do whatever else you want.

the hammer to use if rcom hangs due to enoresellerrecord is icann complaince,
which in time is effective.

-e

why bother getting rcom to grovel through the records they should have
kept (it happens to reseller model registrars, occasionally i'm asked
if i can help a core registrant find their member (reseller)), just do
a transfer request to another registrar (i'm not volunteering) and get
the registrar-of-record changed.

now you know the (gaining) r-of-r, and the (gaining) reseller (if any),
and you're free to do whatever else you want.

Unfortunately, that won't work, because:

Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED

... means that the domain name is locked against transfers, and someone
will first need to login at the existing reseller to unlock it (and
probably to get the transfer authorization code, too).

To the original poster: Why won't Register.com give you the reseller
name? Is it because you're not one of the people listed in their account
records? If so, I can't fully blame them; my company (also a registrar,
although we don't have resellers) also gives out as little information
as possible to "strangers" to discourage social engineering hijacking
attempts. Many companies will confirm information but not volunteer it,
leading to boring conversations along the lines of "Well, I can't tell
you, but can you think of the name of anyone at your company that might
have registered the domain name? No... no... no...".

Have the person listed in the Register.com records call them and you may
get further.

the hammer to use if rcom hangs due to enoresellerrecord is icann complaince,
which in time is effective.

Sadly, ICANN compliance will not do a thing for any individual domain
name incident. Their mechanism for such things is to pass complaints on
to the registrar, even when the registrar IS the problem, as if they're
the Better Business Bureau. I've never seen them intervene in an
individual domain name case.

I once spent a great deal of my time trying to get ICANN compliance to
do something in a few egregious cases before realizing that they
explicitly do not see that as their role. I'd initially assumed their
unhelpfulness was gross incompetence, but it turned out to be a sort of
reverse Hanlon's razor.

> now you know the (gaining) r-of-r, and the (gaining) reseller (if any),
> and you're free to do whatever else you want.

ICANN is one potential recourse against the registrar, if non-cooperative
with the registrant; another one is the courts, and finally: there is the
court of public opinion.

Unfortunately, that won't work, because:
>Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED

... means that the domain name is locked against transfers, and someone
will first need to login at the existing reseller to unlock it (and
probably to get the transfer authorization code, too).

This is a technical block against transfer, that the losing registrar must
not refuse to allow the registrant to remove.

"Instances when the requested change of Registrar may not be denied
include, but are not limited to:

...
  * Domain name in Registrar Lock Status, unless the Registered Name Holder
is provided with the reasonable opportunity and ability to unlock the
domain name prior to the Transfer Request.
"

Sadly, ICANN compliance will not do a thing for any individual domain

name incident. Their mechanism for such things is to pass complaints on
to the registrar, even when the registrar IS the problem, as if they're
the Better Business Bureau. I've never seen them intervene in an
individual domain name case

Perhaps, there need to be some complaints to ICANN about ICANN then.

Or to other community entities about an apparent lack of competent
authority by ICANN,
to even successfully implement their own policies.

I have, but usually you can contact the registry before going to ICANN
if you're having this problem. Registries will lean on the registrars
to behave if there's a problem of this sort.

A