Vadim Antonov <avg@sprint.net> writes:
>
> Routing Registry w/o means to enforce won't be able to keep
> a resemblance of accurate data (not with the modus operandi of
> most providers in US).
We fundamentally disagree here.
I agree that the more the RR is used for actual configurations,
the better the data will be.
I disagree that "enforcement" is necessary.
I disagree that "enforcement" by RS is necessary.
I observe that reasonable quality data can be gathered even when
the only incentive is good citizenship and nice diagnostic tools.
Daniel