Gigarouter

Mailman List Mirror (Read Only)
1

Hi.

Anyone there has any information (experience) about Gigarouters like
GRF1600 (Ascend) or
GSR12000 (Cisco).

I want to know performance, availability, scalability and limitations
data in "real world",
I mean in real condition of internet traffic.

Thanks in advance.

Rogerio

2

Hi.

Anyone there has any information (experience) about Gigarouters like
GRF1600 (Ascend) or

The product had a lot of problems when it first came out (I was a beta
customer), but with hard work Ascend fixed all of them. The box now nice
and stable. If you want to do a lot of OC12 interfaces I would go with the
GSR, but if you are looking for a box to replace your 75xx with, then I
would go with the GRF.

GSR12000 (Cisco).

Very stable, but I have only worked with them for a few weeks.

I want to know performance, availability, scalability and limitations
data in "real world",
I mean in real condition of internet traffic.

The GRF function just find in real world conditions.

Thanks in advance.

Rogerio

<>

Nathan Stratton Telecom & ISP Consulting
www.robotics.net nathan@robotics.net

3

I have information that several ISPs used them and don't any more.

Hi.

Anyone there has any information (experience) about Gigarouters like
GRF1600 (Ascend) or
GSR12000 (Cisco).

I want to know performance, availability, scalability and limitations
data in "real world",
I mean in real condition of internet traffic.

Thanks in advance.

Rogerio

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
   ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs. October 26-28, 1998, Atlanta, GA.
    Three days of clues, news, and views from the industry's best and
    brightest. http://www.ispf.com/ for information and registration.

     Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
       Alex Rubenstein, alex@nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
               Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
     Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone! http://www.nac.net
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --