Bay is not. Proteon is not. Gated (for me, so far) is not.
Microrouters are not. Morningstars are/(?were?). Livingstons
are not.
Why Livingstons are not??? They're terribly easy to configure, IMHO...
> Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
I can only speak for myself, of course.
Me too,
Ed
ok so livingstons are easy to configure.. but are they easy to
REconfigure?? NOPE!! Is it easy to take a look at the entire configuration
at one glance??? NOPE!!
If your livingston were to go down and you needed a new livingston, start
praying to god. Miss one detail and you are still dead.
Pritish
In-Reply-To: <199610211323.JAA25866@access.netaxs.com> from "Avi
Freedman" at Oct 21, 96 09:23:08 am
Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu
the livingston comparision is not even warrented, they lack any
real extensible functionality (only RIP for one exam.)
and with over 30% failure rate on hardware, don't even think about it.
Bay is not. Proteon is not. Gated (for me, so far) is not.
Microrouters are not. Morningstars are/(?were?). Livingstons
are not.
Why Livingstons are not??? They're terribly easy to configure, IMHO...
> Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
I can only speak for myself, of course.
Me too,
Ed
> Bay is not. Proteon is not. Gated (for me, so far) is not.
> Microrouters are not. Morningstars are/(?were?). Livingstons
> are not.Why Livingstons are not??? They're terribly easy to configure, IMHO...
You *must* be joking. Or maybe you haven't worked with a Livingston
frame relay port that has multiple PVCs on it. It is *in no way*
"super-elegant and thus easy to predict and use", not even close.