FCC - with Klezmer backup

http://gcn.com/articles/2011/09/26/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-nov-20.aspx

wondering who is going to publically announce any changes prior to the 20nov date.

Or is this a non-issue for the Internet as we know it?

/bill

Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:53:46 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: FCC - with Klezmer backup

http://gcn.com/articles/2011/09/26/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-nov-20.aspx

wondering who is going to publically announce any changes prior to the
20nov date.

Or is this a non-issue for the Internet as we know it?

I suspect that anyone that was doing it hadn't made any noise about
_doing_ it, so they're unlikely to announce that they've _stopped_ do
ing so. All such an announcement would accomplish is to 'confirm
suspicions', which is (obviously) not to that provider's advantage.

but there -are- reporting requirements now... :slight_smile:
  and a formal complaint process...

  flash mobs - ready to file complaints about Ameritech? PacBell? GTE?

/bill

What does

"commercial terms of their broadband services."

mean?

Peering arrangements? Transit pricing?

This guy, who seems to have 'is feces all assembled, thinks that it will
just be a game of T-ball: everyone has fun, no one gets hurt:

http://www.telecomramblings.com/2011/09/net-neutrality-t-ball/

He also notes that L3/GBLX was approved, in a more recent post.

Cheers,
-- jra