http://gcn.com/articles/2011/09/26/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-nov-20.aspx
wondering who is going to publically announce any changes prior to the 20nov date.
Or is this a non-issue for the Internet as we know it?
/bill
http://gcn.com/articles/2011/09/26/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-nov-20.aspx
wondering who is going to publically announce any changes prior to the 20nov date.
Or is this a non-issue for the Internet as we know it?
/bill
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:53:46 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: FCC - with Klezmer backuphttp://gcn.com/articles/2011/09/26/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-nov-20.aspx
wondering who is going to publically announce any changes prior to the
20nov date.Or is this a non-issue for the Internet as we know it?
I suspect that anyone that was doing it hadn't made any noise about
_doing_ it, so they're unlikely to announce that they've _stopped_ do
ing so. All such an announcement would accomplish is to 'confirm
suspicions', which is (obviously) not to that provider's advantage.
but there -are- reporting requirements now...
and a formal complaint process...
flash mobs - ready to file complaints about Ameritech? PacBell? GTE?
/bill
What does
"commercial terms of their broadband services."
mean?
Peering arrangements? Transit pricing?
This guy, who seems to have 'is feces all assembled, thinks that it will
just be a game of T-ball: everyone has fun, no one gets hurt:
http://www.telecomramblings.com/2011/09/net-neutrality-t-ball/
He also notes that L3/GBLX was approved, in a more recent post.
Cheers,
-- jra