==>Check out ... http://www.boardwatch.com/isp/fallisp/intermci.htm
==>
==>"On March 18, 1996, MCI announced [yada yada yada, more backbone,
==>OC-3 circuits, direct connections blah blah blah] ..."
==>
==>And then my favorite part.. "They maintain a Network Operations
==>Center in Carey [sic], North Carolina.
==>
==>Sean Doran is Senior Network Engineer. "
==>---
I looked at the paper guide handed out at NANOG. In there, they list Sean
Doran as the Senior Network Engineer for both Sprint and MCI.
I looked at the paper guide handed out at NANOG. In there, they list Sean
Doran as the Senior Network Engineer for both Sprint and MCI.
Conflict of interest? =)
Hey, Sean, can you be my Senior Network Engineer, too? Duties include
sleeping up to 8 hours every night and drinking (1) free beer should we
happen to end up at the same bar some evening at a conference.
In general, I found this issue at least (I can't speak for other issues)
to be one of the most grossly inaccurate pieces of "journalism" I've ever
seen
Then again, coming from the same people who told one letter writer to "Go
to the InterNIC" for the 8 IP addresses he wanted....
I guess I never outgrew the luxury of sleeping for 8 hours.
Anyway, why doesn't someone just mail the editor of Boardwatch [a nice guy
I might add], and correct all the mistakes that are in it. Boardwatch is
just starting to become an Internet oriented magazine, they are bound to
make mistakes. Even include a few URL's of pointers which would be
beneficial.
Remember, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.
[now that was corny wasn't it?]