In article <2004912185512.597528@sysop-02>, Ken Gilmour <ken@playersonly.com> writes
Does anyone know of a list like nanog for Europe? I would be interested in
subscribing...
If your network is member of LINX or AMS-IX you will find there some private lists which discuss a European flavour of many of the things I see on NANOG.
You can state what you like, but the income from the NCC is
what mostly funds the other RIPE activities, in which case
its all the same to me, does the EOF live on a RIPE.NET server?
Yes. Who funds those servers?
more to the point, who decided meeting content? essentially daniel
karrenberg does.
> : > simply not true. Check out SwiNOG http://www.swinog.ch/
> : And there's NordNOG.
> Anyone got a list of all english language NOG mailing lists? So far I
> have AFNOG, SwiNOG (apparently some in english) and SANOG.
In article <16709.59751.773517.826245@roam.psg.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> writes
You can state what you like, but the income from the NCC is
what mostly funds the other RIPE activities, in which case
its all the same to me, does the EOF live on a RIPE.NET server?
Yes. Who funds those servers?
more to the point, who decided meeting content? essentially daniel
karrenberg does.
I thought it was a committee of the Workgroup chairs (apart perhaps from the first day).
: At 10:36 13/09/2004 -1000, Scott Weeks wrote:
:
: >Anyone got a list of all english language NOG mailing lists? So far I
: >have AFNOG, SwiNOG (apparently some in english) and SANOG.
:
: My little list includes:
:
: NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, JANOG, EOF, APOPS, SGNOG, NZNOG, NordNOG, SwiNOG, PACNOG
:
: So, North America, Africa, South Asia, Japan, Europe, Asia Pacific,
: Singapore, New Zealand, Nordic Countries, Switzerland, Pacific.
I briefly looked and NordNOG wasn't an english speaking list. (no
surprise there... I only read in english, thus my request for english
language NOG lists. Did I miss that and are the others you mention in the
english language?
Like I mentioned privately to another person that replied: Too bad there's
not a GNOG (Global) done in many languages and a person could subscribe to
the language he/she desired. Don't know how one could afford the
interpreters for the list, but it'd sure be a good thing if the S/N could
be kept low.
: On 2004-09-14, at 16.36, Scott Weeks wrote:
:
: > I briefly looked and NordNOG wasn't an english speaking list. (no
: > surprise there... I only read in english, thus my request for
: > english
: > language NOG lists. Did I miss that and are the others you mention in
: > the
: > english language?
:
: As I created NordNOG I can assure you it is english speaking. Actually,
: I have no idea how think we would otherwise communicate To the best
: of my knowledge there have been one or two messages in Swedish. It is a
: low volume list though, but that is another issue.
Oops, I must've looked at the one or 2 in the archives. I guess I looked
too briefly.
"The European Operators Forum (EOF) is a forum where new
technologydevelopments of interest to Internet Protocol network
operators arepresented and discussed. The EOF has no formal charter or
chair. The agenda is co-ordinated by a program committee led by Rob
Blokzijl, RIPE Chair.
Participation is open to all interested parties. The EOF is normally a
day and a half session that takes place prior to scheduled RIPE Working
Group sessions. The Program Committee welcomes input for possible
topics and can be reached at <eof-coord@ripe.net>. ... "
All sugestions for content go to the eof-coord list. Anyone willing to
contribute to putting together the EOF programme is welcome to join this
list. It is an extremely informal group. Most, if not all, RIPE WG
chairpeople are on the list; but it is not limited to them. The RIPE NCC
currently supports me to act as a secretary and to look after the
meeting/speaker logistics.
"The European Operators Forum (EOF) is a forum where new
technologydevelopments of interest to Internet Protocol network
operators arepresented and discussed. The EOF has no formal charter or
chair. The agenda is co-ordinated by a program committee led by Rob
Blokzijl, RIPE Chair.
this is not really consistent with http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/eof/index.html, It would also be more
transparent if someone know of which members the program committee
consist of.
But this are pennies. I would much appreciate if EOF gets more input
from "RIPE" operators.
I would much appreciate if EOF gets more input from "RIPE" operators.
this is a problem with eof, nanog, apricot, ... the actual running
and decision-making is not done by operators. it is done by the
usual well-meaning people representing operators. and, of course,
they are in extreme, and almost amusing, denial that there is a
difference.
i am not sure how foro de redes is currently operated; it used to
be heavily operator run. it is interesting to note that afnog is
organized and run pretty much by operators. i guess they can't
afford net.bureaucrats to represent them :-).
this is a problem with eof, nanog, apricot, ... the actual running
and decision-making is not done by operators. it is done by the
usual well-meaning people representing operators. and, of course,
At least in apricot's case, if anybody wants to help, and proves that he can
help effectively, he / she is welcome to help .. it kind of boils down to "X,
Y and Z are willing to roll up their sleeves and help in everything from
chasing after sponsors, running a registration system etc to actually coming
into the conference venue with a satchel full of access points and wiring the
place up"
Operators, vendors, people who represent the operator community, it doesn't
really matter at all. Anyone who is willing to spare technical /
organizational expertise and considerable chunks of spare time is welcome to
step up to the plate and volunteer.
srs (not speaking for the apricot mgmt committee here)