EIGRP support !Cisco

Completely agree. But this is needed to integrate into an existing network.
OSPF would've been my first choice.

Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(855) FLSPEED x106

But this is needed to integrate into an existing network.

Route redistribution?

cringe<

or eBGP?

you'll need to pay cisco tax then. Cisco opened up most of eigrp to the
ietf as an informational rfc, but didn't release anything related to eigrp
stub areas. This means that the ietf release is not that useful if a
vendor wanted feature parity with cisco's implementation. So far I'm not
aware of any vendors who have implemented it. Maybe some will do so in future.

Nick

But this is needed to integrate into an existing network.

Route redistribution?

I've done mixed eigrp ospf environments in places where I wasn't
responsible for legacy decisions... it worked pretty much like you'd
expect, which is fine more or less. but I also don't work there anymore
so your mileage may vary...

cringe<

or eBGP?

Is harder to screw up in my experience.