Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but google.com still show search engine. Please advise how to do so more visitor in return? May the Gods be with you!
leeyao@trashymail.com wrote:
Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors
but google.com still show search engine.
For which your customers are grateful....
Please advise how to do so more visitor in return? May the Gods be with you!
Mine prefers not to cheat.
well... to answer the question (how do i hijack DNS lables
to generate more traffic to my site?) - I suggest the following:
*NOTE* - you may need to backout o an earlier version of BIND,
then this will generate some increased traffic temporarally
but will bring down the wrath of the ISP community on you...
or, they might let you melt in your own stupidity... with that
disclaimer::::
; add these RR's to your zone
$ORIGIN .
*.com. IN A 127.0.0.1
*.net. IN A 127.0.0.1
*.org. IN AAAA ::1
; end of temporary traffic generator
as an aside, Cricket, you might want to write another book on
stupid DNS tricks that don't work the way one thinkis they might.
--bill
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0000):
>
> >
> >Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors
> >but google.com still show search engine.
If you want a serious answer to your question, it's because your
customers are not using your DNS servers to resolve queries (bully for
them, I say).
The next (evil) step that you would have to take would be to intercept
outbound DNS queries (or maybe just the replies, even more evil) and
replace the answers with the ones you want. There are lots reasons not
to do this.
The (slighty less evil, IMHO) other option would be for you to keep
track of google.com's ips (not so easy, as you'll see once you try) and
intercept web requests to those ips and replace them with your own.
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0000):
>
> >
> > >
> > >Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors
> > >but google.com still show search engine.If you want a serious answer to your question, it's because your
customers are not using your DNS servers to resolve queries (bully for
them, I say).The next (evil) step that you would have to take would be to intercept
outbound DNS queries (or maybe just the replies, even more evil) and
replace the answers with the ones you want. There are lots reasons not
to do this.The (slighty less evil, IMHO) other option would be for you to keep
track of google.com's ips (not so easy, as you'll see once you try) and
intercept web requests to those ips and replace them with your own.
This comes from an "Attorney and Counselor-at-Law", and without
a legal disclaimer? I'm shocked.
I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm
sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
Tuc/TBOH
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 12:12:41PM -0400):
>
>
> bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0000):
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors
> > > >but google.com still show search engine.
>
> If you want a serious answer to your question, it's because your
> customers are not using your DNS servers to resolve queries (bully for
> them, I say).
>
> The next (evil) step that you would have to take would be to intercept
> outbound DNS queries (or maybe just the replies, even more evil) and
> replace the answers with the ones you want. There are lots reasons not
> to do this.
>
> The (slighty less evil, IMHO) other option would be for you to keep
> track of google.com's ips (not so easy, as you'll see once you try) and
> intercept web requests to those ips and replace them with your own.
>
This comes from an "Attorney and Counselor-at-Law", and without
a legal disclaimer? I'm shocked.
Most electronic disclaimers aren't worth the paper they're printed
upon. 
I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm
sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
I kinda hoped that anyone reading the above would NOT get the impression
I'm advocating this. I'm not (unless you're a country with population
exceeding one billion, in which case you write your own rules.
This begs the question... why is the OP trying to do this with DNS
instead of a caching proxy?
-Jim P.
(no legal disclaimer here)
I am shocked this many people responded to this post...
-Ray
Because there is no "Your kloo must be this tall to ride the Internet"
sign posted.
I am shocked this many people responded to this post...
-Ray
Just because something is possible it doesn't mean it should be done. It really is a Bad Idea (tm) to do stuff like falsifying DNS entries and all that kinda nasty stuff. Sure, it's possible - but that doesn't make it right.
I think this thread is obviously silly, so please refrain from posting
further on this and feeding the troll...
Thanks!
because it's messing with basic plumbing in an odd manner.