If you wouldn’t mind a quick tracerooute - Can you confirm reachability to the following:
2001:500:84::b
Thanks in advance.
/bill
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet.
If you wouldn’t mind a quick tracerooute - Can you confirm reachability to the following:
2001:500:84::b
Thanks in advance.
/bill
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet.
traceroute to 2001:500:84::b (2001:500:84::b) from 2a04:840:0:2::8baf:41a6, 30 hops max, 24 byte packets
1 2a04:840:0:2::1 (2a04:840:0:2::1) 0.299 ms 0.299 ms 1.03 ms
2 2a00:1c10:3:667::a (2a00:1c10:3:667::a) 1.172 ms 1.42 ms 1.355 ms
3 rtr-23-121-141-2914.thn.v6.custdc.net (2a00:1c10:ffff:1::2914:161) 3.375 ms 2.768 ms 3.684 ms
4 ae-4.r23.londen03.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net (2001:728:0:2000::29) 1.866 ms 1.899 ms 1.866 ms
5 ae-3.r22.amstnl02.nl.bb.gin.ntt.net (2001:728:0:2000::16) 9.383 ms 36.228 ms 9.444 ms
6 ae-0.r23.amstnl02.nl.bb.gin.ntt.net (2001:418:0:2000::1c6) 9.367 ms 19.211 ms 9.387 ms
7 ae-7.r21.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (2001:418:0:2000::1b1) 91.736 ms 91.679 ms 91.688 ms
8 ae-0.r20.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (2001:418:0:2000::d) 102.92 ms 91.509 ms 91.442 ms
9 ae-2.r21.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (2001:418:0:2000::1f6) 156.269 ms 156.27 ms 156.435 ms
10 ae-2.r05.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (2001:418:0:2000::14e) 154.111 ms 153.917 ms 153.976 ms
11 * 2001:418:1401:1a::2 (2001:418:1401:1a::2) 150.113 ms *
12 2001:1878::181:177 (2001:1878::181:177) 172.279 ms 168.706 ms 160.806 ms
13 2001:500:84::b (2001:500:84::b) 156.772 ms 156.17 ms 148.251 ms
Looks good from here:
Tracing route to 2001:500:84::b over a maximum of 30 hops
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 2601:8:1400:880::1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 10 ms 9 ms 8 ms te-9-3-ur01.shadygrove.va.richmond.comcast.net [2001:558:182:fb::1]
4 9 ms 9 ms 7 ms xe-12-0-1-0-ar02.staplesmllrd.va.richmond.comcast.net [2001:558:180:25::1]
5 24 ms 24 ms 26 ms pos-3-10-0-0-cr01.56marietta.ga.ibone.comcast.net [2001:558:0:f6e6::1]
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 23 ms 24 ms 23 ms 2001:559::1056
8 23 ms 23 ms 24 ms ae-6.r03.atlnga05.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::31]
9 42 ms 76 ms 90 ms ae-7.r21.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::37d]
10 43 ms 41 ms 41 ms ae-0.r20.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::a9]
11 71 ms 73 ms 90 ms ae-5.r20.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::295]
12 71 ms 72 ms 74 ms ae-1.r05.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::116]
13 73 ms 72 ms 74 ms 2001:418:1401:1a::2
14 72 ms 75 ms 72 ms 2001:1878::181:177
15 74 ms 71 ms 71 ms 2001:500:84::b
There should be a tool for this kind of thing!
https://atlas.ripe.net/atlas/udm.html?msm_id=1666831
or just the data (~1MB):
https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/measurement/1666831/result/
Cheers,
Robert
Measurement: 1666834 should be bill's measurement request... 50
icmptraceroutes from around the globez.
Measurement: 1666834 should be bill's measurement request... 50
icmptraceroutes from around the globez.
Or ring-ping and ring-trace:
https://ring.nlnog.net/toolbox/
-Hank
traceroute6 to 2001:500:84::b (2001:500:84::b) from 2620::930:0:28e6:7b60:e856:aad7, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 2620:0:930::cafe:beef 82.620 ms 0.772 ms 1.622 ms
2 2620::930:0:2e6b:f5ff:fe03:a80 1.965 ms 3.523 ms 2.613 ms
3 owen-2.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net 16.909 ms 18.061 ms 17.007 ms
4 ge5-10.core1.fmt1.he.net 17.122 ms 22.394 ms 15.948 ms
5 10ge3-4.core3.fmt2.he.net 18.848 ms 16.894 ms 19.103 ms
6 10ge12-1.core1.lax1.he.net 26.129 ms 27.115 ms 25.247 ms
7 10ge1-3.core1.lax2.he.net 24.409 ms 24.877 ms 25.065 ms
8 *
2001:504:13::210:43 28.831 ms 28.393 ms
9 2001:1878::181:177 31.308 ms 29.668 ms 25.611 ms
10 2001:500:84::b 24.900 ms 220.098 ms 188.378 ms
From Mombasa, Kenya (you're welcome to use
http://lg.seacomnet.com/):
lg-01-mba.ke>traceroute 2001:500:84::b
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 2001:500:84::B
1 ge-1-0-0-213.mba6-201-access-3.mpls.seacomnet.com (2C0F:FEB0:5:FFFF::1) [AS 37100] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
2 xe-3-0-0.lon6-201-access-3.mpls.seacomnet.com (2C0F:FEB0:0:20::1) [AS 37100] 452 msec 268 msec 632 msec
3 xe-0-0-0-0.pp6-01-lhr.uk.seacomnet.com (2C0F:FEB0:0:23::6) [AS 37100] 132 msec 132 msec 128 msec
4 40ge1-3.core1.lon2.he.net (2001:7F8:4::1B1B:1) [AS 5459] 220 msec 216 msec 192 msec
5 100ge1-1.core1.nyc4.he.net (2001:470:0:2CF::2) [AS 6939] 224 msec 232 msec 228 msec
6 10ge10-3.core1.lax1.he.net (2001:470:0:10E::1) [AS 6939] 292 msec 268 msec 272 msec
7 10ge1-3.core1.lax2.he.net (2001:470:0:72::2) [AS 6939] 260 msec 268 msec 272 msec
8 *
usclos-nettos.gigabitethernet4-11.core1.lax2.he.net (2001:470:1:3E8::2) 256 msec *
9 2001:1878::181:177 [AS 226] 288 msec 284 msec 296 msec
10 2001:500:84::B [AS 226] 292 msec 264 msec 276 msec
lg-01-mba.ke>
Cheers,
Mark.
# ADDRESS LOSS SENT LAST AVG BEST
WORST STD-DEV STATUS
1 2001:504:13::1a 0% 6 8.4ms 12.2 8.4
19.9 5.3
2 2001:470:1:3e8::2 0% 6 9.2ms 9.2 9.1
9.4 0.1
3 2001:1878::181:177 0% 6 8.8ms 9 8.8
10 0.4
4 2001:500:84::b 0% 6 9ms 8.7 8.6
9 0.1
If you wouldn't mind a quick tracerooute - Can you confirm
reachability to the following:
2001:500:84::b
Thanks in advance.
traceroute6 to 2001:500:84::b (2001:500:84::b) from 2a04:b900::1:0:0:15, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 office.bijgepunt.nlnetlabs.nl 0.333 ms 0.314 ms 0.308 ms
2 2a02:d28:5580:e:1000::245 0.589 ms 0.611 ms 0.507 ms
3 eth1-1.core1.ams1.nl.as5580.net 0.554 ms 0.549 ms 0.536 ms
4 eth1-8.r1.ams2.nl.as5580.net 0.694 ms 13.099 ms 4.514 ms
5 30gigabitethernet1-3.core1.ams1.he.net 8.437 ms 1.450 ms 1.651 ms
6 100ge9-1.core1.lon2.he.net 17.578 ms 7.245 ms 17.896 ms
7 100ge1-1.core1.nyc4.he.net 86.636 ms 82.937 ms 103.756 ms
8 10ge10-3.core1.lax1.he.net 159.165 ms 164.547 ms 153.020 ms
9 10ge1-3.core1.lax2.he.net 158.396 ms 153.472 ms 152.610 ms
10 2001:504:13::210:43 153.222 ms 154.124 ms 153.499 ms
11 2001:1878::181:177 153.629 ms 153.891 ms 153.103 ms
12 2001:500:84::b 153.426 ms 153.167 ms 152.977 ms
[shortened version for NANOG with only one attachment]
When you analyse these results with using my experimental tool LARA
http://labske.org/tools
you discover that local connectivity is through HE and Los Nettos.
Further you can see that about half the HE packets are sent via Los
Nettos, so the amount ofredundancy that local traffic distribution among
upstreams may suggest is not really there.
If you like we can run this again with more probes. Of course you can
also just get an account and run it yourself....
Daniel