This sounds a lot like the slippery slope of static routing being the most
stable, so we should encourage its use Internet wide. I -know- Karl D.
(and others that depend on dynamic routing for alternate provider fallback)
will kick at this.
Why? What we have been arguing for has been limiting
the scope of dynamic routing only to places where
participating in global dynamic routing makes sense.
In the case of multihomed networks, the appropriate
technique is, in most simple cases I am aware of:
Provider X Provider Y