YouTube IP Hijacking

Mailman List Mirror (Read Only)
1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Well... If you want to work on one, I'm willing help shepherd it
through
the process. We even have a working group setup for that purpose.

proposal for work in GROW?

Actually, that sounds reasonable -- if GROW [1] outcomes are heeded
by the operations community.

Historically, it seems, the Internet operations community picks
and chooses the IETF RFCs/BCPs that each ISP implements on a
"one-off" basis.

Something (else) that I have long admired is the way the RIPE
community has built working groups around critical issues.

I'm still convinced that the NANOG community -- perhaps in
collaboration with RIPE and APNIC, et al -- should work to
craft ISP "best current practices" in these areas, since ISPs
don't seem to heed IETF documents, except when it serves their
own business & operational practices.

- - ferg

[1] http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/grow-charter.html

2

Paul Ferguson wrote:

I'm still convinced that the NANOG community -- perhaps in
collaboration with RIPE and APNIC, et al -- should work to
craft ISP "best current practices" in these areas, since ISPs
don't seem to heed IETF documents, except when it serves their
own business & operational practices.

- ferg

[1] http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/grow-charter.html

HELL NO(1)! Lets instead wait until the entire thing caves in, we run
out of IPv4 space, and the governments have to step in and fix it for
us. That's a solution!

Andrew

(1) This would be a vote of support for what Paul is saying.