why not peer with LS disabling networks ?

Mailman List Mirror (Read Only)
1

Randy Bush wrote:
:-> <insert replay of we don't peer with LSR inhibitors discussion>
:->

Randy,

I'm curious - is this a firm "NO" thing, or do you peer with people
that offer alternatives ? We disable LSR a/x our whole net but still
provide a traceroute server and (RSN) a looking glass. What other
reasons do you want LSR enabled for ?

:-> randy
:->

Cheers,

Lyndon Levesley
GX Networks

2

<insert replay of we don't peer with LSR inhibitors discussion>

I'm curious - is this a firm "NO" thing, or do you peer with people
that offer alternatives ? We disable LSR a/x our whole net but still
provide a traceroute server and (RSN) a looking glass. What other
reasons do you want LSR enabled for ?

We use LSR for debugging. We have many peers. We do not intend to maintain
a procedure of the week manual for each peer. Hell to maintain and does not
scale.

randy

3

traceroute -g can be a surprisingly useful tool.

- paul

4

Hello Paul,