Peter Galbavy wrote:
> According to information provided to me, 9netave is in no uncertain terms
> is refusing to take down the site without a court order.
The provider is waiting for an external agency (the courts) to take
the responsibility for saying that the site should be removed. When I
was at Demon, we had a strict policy of not submitting to any third
party requests WRT user account except those either demanded by law,
or those events that clearly breach our AUP - which has the force of
law, as part of the terms and conditions of service.
So 9netave has no AUP prohibiting use of its services for conducting scams?
I would not want to run my web site at a hoster that could become blocked by
many ISPs. But then, I'd never use 9netave for many reasons.