the discussion about the external spam kinda exceeds the volume of the spam itself. just my 2 cents.
just block, delete, continue life
- Technical Maintenance Engineer Parkstad Support BV- Maintainer DroneBL- Peplink Certified Engineer
-------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------Van: firstname.lastname@example.org Datum: 15-06-17 20:09 (GMT+01:00) Aan: Dan Hollis <email@example.com> Cc: Niels Bakker <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Onderwerp: Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees
> > Merely deciding not to patronize them may not be sufficient and that's
> > why we make that sort of thing just outright illegal rather than hope
> > market forces will suffice.
> Most spam is sent from compromised machines anyway, so there are already
> criminal violations involved in sending spam.
FWIW I believe the context was a vendor spamming NANOG attendees (see
the Subject:) so not likely being done from compromised machines.
That said, yes, a lot of spam is sent from compromised machines as you
But criminal violations can be additive, even rising to things like
RICO charges (a pattern of organized criminal behavior etc.) which can
be both criminal and civil and added onto charges like the criminality
of specific mechanisms (compromised systems etc.)
It really depends on how interested one can get the legal machinery in
the problem. Thus far that's hit or miss. I can't find any instance
where RICO charges were used against a spam gang tho, at least on a